ULTA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Casey's General Stores has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Ulta Beauty's net margin of 2.23%. Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 51.13% beat Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85%.

Ulta Beauty has a consensus price target of $410.24, signalling upside risk potential of 20.35%. On the other hand Casey's General Stores has an analysts' consensus of $427.37 which suggests that it could grow by 8.24%. Given that Ulta Beauty has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Ulta Beauty is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 34.036% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.874, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.633%.

Ulta Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Casey's General Stores offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Ulta Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores pays out 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Ulta Beauty's net income of $393.3M is higher than Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M. Notably, Ulta Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.44x while Casey's General Stores's PE ratio is 27.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ulta Beauty is 1.43x versus 0.95x for Casey's General Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Ulta Beauty's net margin of 7.7%. Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 51.13% beat Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 40.21%.

Ulta Beauty has a consensus price target of $410.24, signalling upside risk potential of 20.35%. On the other hand Dick's Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of $234.40 which suggests that it could grow by 22.5%. Given that Dick's Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Ulta Beauty, analysts believe Dick's Sporting Goods is more attractive than Ulta Beauty.

Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 34.036% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.536, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.609%.

Ulta Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dick's Sporting Goods offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Ulta Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods pays out 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Ulta Beauty's net income of $393.3M is higher than Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $300M. Notably, Ulta Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.44x while Dick's Sporting Goods's PE ratio is 13.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ulta Beauty is 1.43x versus 1.18x for Dick's Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sally Beauty Holdings has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Ulta Beauty's net margin of 6.51%. Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 51.13% beat Sally Beauty Holdings's return on equity of 29.79%.

Ulta Beauty has a consensus price target of $410.24, signalling upside risk potential of 20.35%. On the other hand Sally Beauty Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $12.75 which suggests that it could grow by 50%. Given that Sally Beauty Holdings has higher upside potential than Ulta Beauty, analysts believe Sally Beauty Holdings is more attractive than Ulta Beauty.

Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 34.036% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sally Beauty Holdings has a beta of 1.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.491%.

Ulta Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sally Beauty Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ulta Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sally Beauty Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Sally Beauty Holdings quarterly revenues of $937.9M. Ulta Beauty's net income of $393.3M is higher than Sally Beauty Holdings's net income of $61M. Notably, Ulta Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.44x while Sally Beauty Holdings's PE ratio is 5.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ulta Beauty is 1.43x versus 0.24x for Sally Beauty Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Ulta Beauty's net margin of -0.11%. Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 51.13% beat Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -13.01%.

Ulta Beauty has a consensus price target of $410.24, signalling upside risk potential of 20.35%. On the other hand Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.30 which suggests that it could grow by 243.04%. Given that Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has higher upside potential than Ulta Beauty, analysts believe Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is more attractive than Ulta Beauty.

Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 34.036% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.493%.

Ulta Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ulta Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues of $324.3M. Ulta Beauty's net income of $393.3M is higher than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$364K. Notably, Ulta Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.44x while Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ulta Beauty is 1.43x versus 0.03x for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.